prescriptive right
51Theodore Roosevelt: False Sentimentality About the Indians — ▪ Primary Source Theodore Roosevelt favored a rational and equitable policy toward Native Americans, but he firmly believed that the Indian nations had no claim to the land they inhabited and were in fact nomadic people who by… …
52Brussels — • Capital of the Kingdom of Belgium Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Brussels Brussels † …
53common in gross — also common at large A species of common which is neither appendant nor appurtenant to land, but is annexed to a man s person, being granted to him and his heirs by deed; or it may be claimed by prescriptive right, as by a person of a church or… …
54common at large — also common in gross A species of common which is neither appendant nor appurtenant to land, but is annexed to a man s person, being granted to him and his heirs by deed; or it may be claimed by prescriptive right, as by a person of a church or… …
55jactus lapilli — /jaektas lapilay/ The throwing down of a stone. One of the modes, under the civil law, of interrupting prescription. Where one person was building on another s ground, and in this way acquiring a right by usucapio, the true owner challenged the… …
56common in gross — also common at large A species of common which is neither appendant nor appurtenant to land, but is annexed to a man s person, being granted to him and his heirs by deed; or it may be claimed by prescriptive right, as by a person of a church or… …
57common at large — also common in gross A species of common which is neither appendant nor appurtenant to land, but is annexed to a man s person, being granted to him and his heirs by deed; or it may be claimed by prescriptive right, as by a person of a church or… …
58jactus lapilli — /jaektas lapilay/ The throwing down of a stone. One of the modes, under the civil law, of interrupting prescription. Where one person was building on another s ground, and in this way acquiring a right by usucapio, the true owner challenged the… …
59de minimis non carat lex — The law is not concerned with trifles. Loeffler v Roe (Fla) 69 So 2d 331, 47 ALR2d 319. A maxim leading to the rule that accepts substantial performance as a sufficient performance of a contract, 17 Am J2d Contr § 370; sometimes applied to… …
60exclusive use — A use which gives rise to a prescriptive right, not because it excludes the holder of the legal title or other persons from the premises, but because it is not dependent upon a similar right in another person. Marta v Trincia, 26 Dei Ch 94, 22… …
