in-conveniēns
71Domicile (law) — Conflict of laws Preliminiarie …
72Default judgment — Civil procedure in the United States Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Doctrines of civil procedure Jurisdiction Subject matter jurisdiction Diversity jurisdiction Personal jurisdiction Removal jurisdiction Venue Change of venue …
73Indispensable party — Civil procedure in the United States Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Doctrines of civil procedure Jurisdiction Subject matter jurisdiction Diversity jurisdiction Personal jurisdiction Removal jurisdiction Venue Change of venue …
74Change of venue — A change of venue is the legal term for moving a trial to a new location. In high profile matters, a change of venue may occur to move a jury trial away from a location where a fair and impartial jury may not be possible due to widespread… …
75Tort (conflict) — In Conflict of Laws, the choice of law rules for tort are intended to select the lex causae by which to determine the nature and scope of the judicial remedy to claim damages for loss or damage suffered.HistoryThe first attempts to establish a… …
76Conflict of laws in the United States — Conflict of laws Preliminiari …
77Brussels Regime — The Brussels Regime is a set of rules regulating the allocation of jurisdiction in international legal disputes of a civil or commercial nature involving persons resident in a member state of the European Union (EU). It has detailed rules… …
78Property (conflict) — In Conflict of Laws, the subject of Property Law follows the terminology of the civil law systems out of Comity. Hence, there are two types of property: * Immovables is the equivalent of real property in common law systems, i.e. it is land or any …
79List of Eucalyptus species — This is an alphabetical list of 734 Eucalyptus species and 3 hybrids. Hybrids are listed under the letter x (e.g., Eucalyptus x bennettiae). Contents 1 List 1.1 A 1.2 B 1.3 C …
80Filártiga v. Peña-Irala — Filártiga v. Peña Irala, [http://openjurist.org/630/f2d/876/filartiga v pena irala 630 F.2d 876] (2d Cir. 1980) was a landmark case in United States and international law. It set the precedent for U.S. courts to punish non U.S. citizens for… …
